Image: born to love logo

Image: Join us on Facebook Image: Join us on Twitter Image: Circle us on Google+ Image: Follow Me on Pinterest

Image: Beginning. Stock Photo Credit: thier ( All Rights Reserved Image: Baby Boy. Stock Photo Credit: boymk ( All Rights Reserved Image: Curious. Stock Photo Credit: Springj ( All Rights Reserved Image: Baby Autumn. Stock Photo Credit: GERAS ( All Rights Reserved Image: Sweet baby. Stock Photo Credit: jyobish ( All Rights Reserved




HTML Comment Box is loading comments...

Worldwide Diapering Resources:

Main Resources Index
US Resources
European Resources
Canadian Resources
Australian/New Zealand
Youth/Adult Resources
Menstrual Resources
WAHM Companies
Manufacturing Companies
Diaper Services
What's New!

More Resources:

Diaper Reviews
Company Reviews
Online Articles
Diaper Swaps
Diaper Message Boards
Books to read
Off-line Articles
Folding Instructions
Sew Your Own Diapers and Covers
Diaper Rash Articles
Cloth Diapering Tips
Dangers of Disposables
Cost Comparisons - Cloth vs Disposables
Washing Instructions/Tips
Why Cloth? Cloth vs Disposables
Miscellaneous Articles
Fun Diaper Articles!
More Resources
Diaper FAQ
Catalogue Request Page

tree bar

Dangers Of Disposables:

Buy from Amazon
Soap Opera - The Inside Story of Procter & Gamble Soap Opera - The Inside Story of Procter & Gamble

Sparks flying from Huggies! Scary stuff!
Friday April 23, 1999
Baby glow - 11 month old Joshua Furlough startled his mum when his nappy started firing sparks. Jill Furlough, from Lakenheath in Suffolk, woke to find the sparks emanating from the nether regions of her infant sprog, who was bathed in a strange glow. A spokesman for manufacturers Huggies said: "No-one understands where it comes from - it is some kind of energy build-up that changes from mechanical to light energy. But it's completely harmless."

Greenpeace Toxic Site
... Organotins in various consumer products over the last years (see chronology). In 1997, Organotins were detected i.a. in tampons, sanitary pads and diapers in the Netherlands. In early 2000, Tributyltin was found in Scotch-brite scouring pads in Sweden. In the course of 2000, in addition to the findings ...

Greenpeace Calls on Parents to Return Contaminated Nappies to Producers: New Tests Show That TBT-free Nappies are a Rarity
19 May 2000 HAMBURG -- Greenpeace today published new test results of nappies, and called on parents to return nappies ...

Disposable Diapers Linked to Infertility and Testicular Cancer
Scientists in Germany now believe disposable diapers could be linked to both male infertility and testicular cancer. The new research suggests that disposable diapers may have an adverse affect on the development of a boy's reproductive system.

Buy from Amazon
Whitewash - Exposing the Health and Environmental Dangers of Women's Sanitary Products and Disposable Diapers - What You Can Do About It Whitewash - Exposing the Health and Environmental Dangers of Women's Sanitary Products and Disposable Diapers - What You Can Do About It

Warning: Pads and Tampons are hazardous to women's health and the environment
By Kelly Holloway
I shivered to think that Ms. Simone wasn't allowed to tell me about something that I and probably she put into our bodies five days a month. Armstrong and Scott point out in their book that Proctor & Gamble's chlorine free designation can mean that the product is chlorine-gas free, but still contains chlorine dioxide or hypochlorite.

Hidden Dangers of Disposable Diapers
Isn't it amazing to think that most of us were raised in cloth diapers, but most of our children have grown up in disposables? Believe it or not, it is not too late to reverse this trend.

Disposable diapers: Are they dangerous?
New Pampers diapers, which include Cruisers and Swaddlers, have been the subject of the two U.S. lawsuits.

Disposable Diaper Chemicals Under Investigation
The Consumer Product Safety Commission has launched an investigation into Pampers Dry Max diapers following complaints of babies and toddlers suffering severe and persistent diaper rashes and blisters that resemble chemical burns.

Solving the Diaper Dilemma
Parents, scientists, and environmentalists have debated long and hard about the diaper question: Are disposable plastic or reusable cloth diapers better for the environment and for the babies themselves? While many of us might answer with a kneejerk "cloth!", the answer isn't necessarily that easy.

YouTube - Dangers of Disposable Diapers
This enviclip talks about what dangers are found in disposable diapers and informs you about the potential health risks with them.

A reader posted: When pampers decided to switch from the original cruisers/swaddlers and put the dry max chemical in, all hell broke loose.
I am in the middle of a lawsuit with Pampers, their diapers (which never did before Dry Max was used) gave my son HORRIBLE chemical burns (which of course Pampers is denying their at fault). It was so bad that his pediatrician went with me to file and is working with me. (he has seen numerous cases as well) and my attorneys.
Here is a few websites that I know of. Please skim through them and take a look
Pampers bring back the OLD CRUISERS/SWADDLERS
Boycott Pampers
Pictures of outbreaks/burns submitted from parents who were using Pampers Cruisers and/or Swaddlers

Buy from Amazon
Mothering (Cloth Diapers, May June 2010) Mothering (Cloth Diapers, May June 2010)

Off-Line Articles:

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986 Feb;94 (2):235-6
Disposable plastic diapers: a foreign body hazard.
Johnson CM 3d
- Foreign body ingestion and aspiration in children has been a serious problem, occasionally resulting in airway obstruction and death. Airway obstruction by balloons and subsequent asphyxiation is well documented.
Respiratory blockage by plastic dry-cleaning sacks has resulted in warning labels on most such materials. Two recent cases of nasal aspiration of plastic coating from a commonly used disposable diaper are compared to reports of similar occurrences documented by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.
On the basis of these reports we recommend that disposable diapers be continuously covered by other clothing to prevent the child's access to the plastic. Otolaryngologists and pediatricians should be aware of the potential hazard when examining diapered children with chronic rhinorrhea or sudden respiratory distress.
PMID: 3083340, UI: 86176215

Contact Dermatitis 1996 Mar;34(3):176-8O
Rosin components identified in diapers.
Karlberg AT, Magnusson K
Division of Occupational Dermatology, National Institute of Occupational Health, Solna, Sweden.
- As part of the investigation of sources of exposure to rosin allergens, disposable diapers (napkins) common on the Swedish market were analyzed, using gas chromatography, to detect the main rosin compounds.
Rosin components were detected in all diapers, the highest amounts in those from the 2 major producers. In these diapers, more rosin was found in the top layer, which is in close contact with the skin than in the fluff.
Despite the possibly minimal risk of induction of sensitization to rosin allergens in diapers, there is a real risk of elicitation of dermatitis in sensitive individuals, especially since penetration is enhanced by occlusion and irritation. Such material is not only used for infant diapers, but also for adult incontinence products and feminine hygiene products.
PMID: 8833460, UI: 96430334

Acute respiratory effects of diaper emissions.
Anderson RC, Anderson JH
Anderson Laboratories, Inc., West Hartford, Vermont, USA.
Mice were monitored with pneumotachographs while they breathed emissions of three brands of disposable diapers (described herein as brands A, B, and C) and one brand of cloth diapers for 1 hr.
The authors used a computerized version of the ASTM-E-981 test method to measure changes in the pattern and frequency of respiration. In response to two brands of disposable diapers, many mice exhibited reduced mid-expiratory airflow velocity, sensory irritation, and pulmonary irritation.
During the peak effects, brand A caused sensory irritation in 47% of the breaths and reduced mid-expiratory airflow velocity in 17% of the breaths (n = 39 mice), whereas the respective percentages noted for brand B were 20% and 15% of the breaths (n = 28 mice).
The effects were generally larger during repeat exposures to these emissions, with up to 89% of breaths showing sensory irritation in response to brand A and up to 35% of breaths showing reduced mid-expiratory airflow velocity with brand B.
A third brand of disposable diapers caused increases in respiratory rate, tidal volume, and mid-expiratory airflow velocity. The emissions of cloth diapers produced only slight SI and slight PI.
Chemical analysis of the emissions revealed several chemicals with documented respiratory toxicity. The results demonstrate that some types of disposable diapers emit mixtures of chemicals that are toxic to the respiratory tract. Disposable diapers should be considered as one of the factors that might cause or exacerbate asthmatic conditions.
PMID: 10501153, UI: 99429261

I know we've missed your favourite article on the dangers of disposables - so tell us and we will add it to the list!

tree bar


Copyright © 1997-2011 - Born to Love


Send questions, comments, and suggestions to:

Born to Love articles are written by

Google+ Profile: +Catherine McDiarmid-Watt

Born to Love is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees.
NOTE: All logos, company names, brands, images, trademarks and other intellectual property are the property of their respective owners.
Born to Love is a participant in the eBay Partner Network, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to

Copyright © 1978 - - All Rights Reserved.
Last updated - November 27, 2016